132. Henriksens Rederi A/S v T.H.Z. Rolimpex (The “Brede”) [1972] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 511; [1973] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 333

Equitable set-off – abatement – not available as a defence against a claim for freight

This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please login. New users may register below.

Existing Users Log In
   
New User Registration
*Please indicate that you agree to the TOS
*Required field