132. Henriksens Rederi A/S v T.H.Z. Rolimpex (The “Brede”) [1972] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 511; [1973] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 333

Equitable set-off – abatement – not available as a defence against a claim for freight

This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please login. New users may register below.

Existing Users Log In
 Remember Me  
New User Registration
*Please indicate that you agree to the TOS
*Required field