490. Jindal Iron & Steel Co. Limited v Islamic Solidarity Shipping Company (“the Jordan II”) [2004] UKHL 49

The Hague/ Hague–Visby Rules – interpretation of Article III r 2, read with r 8 – shippers not obliged to undertake all the functions enumerated

The Facts

Steel coils were shipped from Mumbai to Barcelona and Motril, Spain under Congen bills incorporating a voyage charterparty. The bills of lading contained a general paramount clause incorporating the Hague and the Hague–Visby Rules where applicable.

The charterparty contained a FIOST (free in and out stowed and trimmed) clause and a clause 17 which read as follows:

17.      Shippers / Charterers / Receivers to put the cargo on board, trim and discharge the cargo fee of expense to the vessel.

Both the bills of lading and  the charterparty were governed by English Law.

On outturn, the cargo was found to be damaged, cargo owners alleging negligence in loading, discharge and stowage.

The issue was whether the shippers, who had undertaken responsibility for these functions, or the owners, were liable for the alleged negligence.

Findings

This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please login. New users may register below.

Existing Users Log In
   
New User Registration
* Please indicate that you agree to the Terms of Service
*Required field